BREAKING VACCINE SAFETY PRESS CONFERENCE: LIVE IN 10 MINUTES: Robert DeNiro, RFK Jr.

TODAY, 9:30 am EST–

 

“Activist Robert F. Kennedy and actor Robert De Niro are set to hold a major press conference at the National Press Club Wednesday to discuss the correlation between mercury-containing vaccines and childhood autism.
“The event will focus on the announcement of a unique challenge with substantial cash award to the American people and media,” a press release from Kennedy’s World Mercury Project states.
The conference will also address President Donald Trump’s potential “Vaccine Safety Commission,” which Kennedy claimed he’d been offered an opportunity to chair last month.”

–Adan Salazar, InfoWars

Watch the historic press conference live on InfoWars here. 

9:30 EST

LIVE FEED HERE

Comments

  1. Berenice Kavanagh says:

    “next to of course god america i”

    next to of course god america i
    love you land of the pilgrims’ and so forth oh
    say can you see by the dawn’s early my
    country ’tis of centuries come and go
    and are no more what of it we should worry
    in every language even deafanddumb
    thy sons acclaim your glorious name by gorry
    by jingo by gee by gosh by gum
    why talk of beauty what could be more beaut-
    iful than these heroic happy dead
    who rushed like lions to the roaring slaughter
    they did not stop to think they died instead
    then shall the voice of liberty be mute?
    He spoke. And drank rapidly a glass of water

    By: E.E. Cummings

  2. Arbiter of truth says:

    “Watch the historic press conference live on InfoWars here”

    Historic??? Ha ha ha ha ha!

    The world will little note this sham. Anyone closely examining the offer can see how it has been carefully constructed so that no amount of evidence could ever win the prize.

    No the purpose here is to be able to claim that their assertion has to be “true”, because it has never been disproven.

    Sort of like that former British doctor that likes to initiate lawsuits against people that rightfully label him as a fraud – proclaiming victory upon filing the suit (as if that alone was the same as winning it), then maintaining radio silence when the case is later dropped or dismissed.

    • Stephen Ericson says:

      “No the purpose here is to be able to claim that their assertion has to be “true”, because it has never been disproven.”

      Well, for a quick hundred grand, anyone who can read should be able to submit but one of the tremendous volume of studies that have existed for some time now that seem to make that exact claim.

      Why don’t you go do it right now? You can donate all of your winnings to helping O.J. find whomever murdered Nichole.

      Of course I jest. I mean, even you know that none of those studies are worth the paper that wiped some ass or another. No, I agree about all of this. The money was never meant to be paid out. You figured it out, that was perceptive of you. You should feel good about yourself.

      But that said, how is this announcement not historic? The president who appears to be some sort of Republican, I think, has appointed a Kennedy to help the United States begin to access this whole vaccine safety issue, and a major liberal Hollywood actor has lent his good name to the cause.

      When was the last time that happened? Oh Arbiter of what was it? Truth? Lol.

      • Arbiter of truth says:

        Some simple questions for you to answer, Stephen:
        1. How many media representatives were at this “major” press conference? Can yo name at least the major outlets that were there?

        2. A “historic” development such as this must have been widely reported. Which of the major news organizations (New York Times, Washinton Post, etc.) carried a story about it? Was this covered on any of the network news reports?

        3. Define exactly the standard for “safe” that is intended to be used in judging applicants for the prize. Do they mean absolute safety (chances of harm are zero) or do they mean relative safety (safer than the alternative course of action)?

        Look forward to your answers.

        • Arbiter of truth says:

          One more question:
          “. . . has appointed a Kennedy to help the United States begin to access this whole vaccine safety issue. . .”

          Can you point to the announcement of this “appointment” by theTrump administration? The only one I see talking about it is Kennedy himself.

          • Stephen Ericson says:

            “1. How many media representatives were at this “major” press conference? Can yo name at least the major outlets that were there?”

            I don’t usually like to answer questions with questions, but here goes. Who cares? If you don’t know why nobody cares, you don’t understand the media. Watch an episode of ABC’s nightly news and tell me who the advertisers are, and then ask yourself why they didn’t send reporters.

            “2. A “historic” development such as this must have been widely reported. Which of the major news organizations (New York Times, Washinton Post, etc.) carried a story about it? Was this covered on any of the network news reports?”

            See answer number one.

            “3. Define exactly the standard for “safe” that is intended to be used in judging applicants for the prize. Do they mean absolute safety (chances of harm are zero) or do they mean relative safety (safer than the alternative course of action)?”

            Look into any article in any mainstream article on the subject and apply the same level of rigor.

            http://www.cnn.com/2014/07/01/health/vaccines-for-kids-safe/

          • Stephen Ericson says:

            “Can you point to the announcement of this “appointment” by theTrump administration? The only one I see talking about it is Kennedy himself.”

            This is where I read it.

            http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-appoints-robert-kennedy-jr-chair-vaccine-safety-committee-sceptic-autism-conspiracy-a7520351.html

            I guess the independent uk is just more fake news, ehh?

        • Stephen Ericson says:

          Infowars covered it. They’ve had 48,000,000.00 viewers in the last 30 days. That seems like substantial coverage to me.

          https://www.quantcast.com/infowars.com#trafficCard

          • Arbiter of truth says:

            48 million and 00 hundreths views? Such precision. But how many individuals is that really – one hundred? two hundred?

            The rest of your answers are non-answers – major news outlets did not cover this press conference because it’s not newsworthy – no other reason.

            If that CNN article has already established that vaccines are safe (not absolutely, but relatively by a wide margin) then why would the two clowns go out on a limb by offering a $100,000 prize? You KNOW they are going to demand proof of absolutely no possibility of harm – an impossible, but meaningless standard. Why don’t you just say it?

            Yes, we all know that Trump met with Kennedy, Jr. before he took office. But where is the announcement from the administration now that he has been sworn in? That’s what I asked for.

  3. Stephen Ericson says:

    If this issue is so important to DeNiro, how can he be so decidedly anti Trump?

    Which other candidate did he think was going to give even a hint of recognition to this issue?

    • Sharon Warner says:

      This is two different issues as he said (not an exact quote) Let us leave those differences aside. I think they made it clear it is about safety in vaccines and the health of our children and not politics.

      I hope it plays out this way in the media.

      • Stephen Ericson says:

        I understand that, but it’s difficult to see how the two concepts aren’t married at this point. If he’s so down on Trump, and Trump is the first president to even go near being called anti vax, or even being open minded to that…

        I guess to stay around in Hollywood you have to say what they want you to say. No matter how much he’s glad that Trump is president, and he must be because he’s putting his reputation on the line with all of this, he’s just not allowed to seem joyful that a president who’s sympathetic to this issue is in the White House. How many issues can a mere actor have if THIS is one of your main issues? You’re THAT mad that Hillary lost when someone sympathetic to vaccine safety won? Why?

        I understand that you can hate Trump for his other issues, but if this one is near and dear…well, please tell me which other candidate would lend an ear, a heart and a hand to it BESIDES Trump?

        God bless president Trump. He’s my first president. The first in my lifetime that sees the world the way I see it. This must be how black people felt about Obama.

        • Sharon Warner says:

          There was a meeting in Congressman Posey’s office after the conference where they all agreed this is a bi-partisan issue. I find it incredible that an elected official cannot get documents from the CDC without a FOI that can take 2 years to reply. This commission is about more than vaccine safety. If Pres. Trump accomplishes this and nothing else; he will be one of the best in history.

  4. Sharon Warner says:

    I went to Info wars and only the announcement is there. Went ot JFK’s page an FB must be jammed as Page cannot be displayed. I really wanted to see this live; but I imagine the recording will be up later.

Speak Your Mind