America Wakes To Confusion and Shock As Manafort, Gates Indicted By Mueller on 12 Criminal Counts Including: “Unregistered Agents Of Government Of Ukraine,” Lobbying, Laundering, Tax Fraud And FARA Scandal Reaches To Podesta Group

I may be wrong but this is my best assessment after reading the documents all morning: This is way bigger deeper, more obscene and deadly than mere “money laundering,” and I am astonished that anybody with a brain would try to spin the crux point as the nexus between Trump and Manafort. READ IT.

2006-2014, Manafort and Gates ran a multi-million dollar lobbying campaign “directed by the government of Ukraine.”

The European Centre for A Modern Ukraine.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Imagine what enough money can buy you. This group not only “lobbied multiple members of Congress and their staffs about Ukraine sanctions” but meddled in something cryptically called “the propriety of Yanukovych’s imprisoning his presidential rival, Yulia Tymoshenko…” [Italics mine.]  Now we know why. The MSM is spinning this, rather insanely, as a Trump debacle, though it seems to be a bullet that barely grazes him, but is aimed at the heart of the criminal Podesta gang.

Manafort resigned from the Trump campaign in August of 2016.

Here are the burning questions: Which companies are company A and company B in the indictment? And why is nobody interested in Podesta Inc’s ties to The European Centre For A Modern Ukraine?

 

Company A or B?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FARA documentation here:

 

https://www.fara.gov/docs/5926-Amendment-20170412-80.pdf

And what about all this (JPG below) strangeness between The European Centre For A Modern Ukraine and the US deep state media? Is it incorrect to say there was collusion, it was with the Government of Ukraine, it was (among other things) about THEIR election, while these guys profited, took tens of millions from Ukraine, lobbied members of congress, media, put Yanukovych’s rival in prison, laundered all the profits, and Podesta Inc. was at the center of it WITH Manafort, Gates, and God knows who else?

That’s just for starters.

Tell me if I am wrong, and if so, how I am wrong. Left media is spinning this (meekly) as a Trump scandal, right wing media as a Nothing Burger–I see it as neither, but am getting disoriented, because I don’t see my interpretations reflected elsewhere.

Seems these are big crimes and Podesta is next to be indicted. I welcome corrections in my thinking, but only with documentation and proof. Speculation is only serving to further cloud the already impossibly clouded mess right now. We should take time and not jump to conclusions that fit our political stripes.

 

 

8 thoughts on “America Wakes To Confusion and Shock As Manafort, Gates Indicted By Mueller on 12 Criminal Counts Including: “Unregistered Agents Of Government Of Ukraine,” Lobbying, Laundering, Tax Fraud And FARA Scandal Reaches To Podesta Group

  1. Popodopilus wore a wire for over 4 months , ha ha , if you think this ain’t about trump . You’ve a screw loose.

  2. FACT: Special counsel Robert Mueller filed federal charges against Trump-campaign officials Paul Manafort and Rick Gates for activities from 2006-2015 (before either was associated with Trump campaign) regarding illegal activities concerning the Ukraine. The Ukraine and Russia are on opposite sides of reality. Putin is NOT Ukrainian.

    TWIST: While none of the charges had anything to do with Putin nor Trump, somehow this indictment is being spun to make people think allegations of Putin influencing Trump must be true.

    This is an excellent example of how minds are manipulated to see something that does not exist simply because Main Steam Media is pushing an agenda.

    Another example of how MSM manipulates information is by refusing to report actual news in an unbiased way and to not let up until the facts are clear and undeniable. Jon Rappoport builds on the indictment story by focusing on Special counsel Robert Mueller to demonstrate a possible much more sinister – and under reported – story.

    In May 2017, former FBI Director Robert Mueller was appointed Special Counsel to investigate any coordination between Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign and the Russian government as part of the Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections and related matters. Why Mueller was chosen for this job is as convoluted as it gets and borders on just plain nuts. Mueller is quite honestly a shady character, if we only look at one episode occurring while he was Director of the FBI.

    FACT: The Russian atomic energy agency from 2009-2013, Rosatom, managed to gain control over a Canadian company called Uranium One that had control over a large amount of U.S. uranium production. But because uranium is a US “national security” product, various US federal agencies had to OK the deal including Hillary Clinton’s US State Department, which did approve the deal. WTF???

    From the New York Times: “…the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States.”

    TWIST: The following headline was run by the New York Times on April 23, 2015: “Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal.” This story ran for one day. As Rappoport reports: “The Times had its hands on a volcanic piece…and they let it drop. Because the ceiling and the limit had been reached, The Times basically executed what’s called a limited hangout, a partial exposure of a story that was getting too hot to suppress entirely.”

    FACTS: What was the story behind the headline? The Clinton Foundation had sizeable donations from the following during this transfer of uranium production to the Russians, while Hillary was Secretary of State (2001 to 2009): leaders of the Canadian mining who built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One, as well as a $31.3 million donation by Frank Giustra…a mining financier. All of this transpired while Robert Mueller was FBI Director (2001-2013).

    FOX News: “The Hill reported that the FBI had evidence as early as 2009 that Russian operatives used bribes, kickbacks and other dirty tactics to expand Moscow’s atomic energy footprint in the U.S. — but the Obama administration approved the uranium deal benefitting Moscow anyway.”

    Rappoport concludes:

    “Newsweek contacted the FBI a few days ago, asking whether Mueller had informed the Obama White House about his old FBI probe that uncovered Russian corruption relevant to the uranium deal that was being put together at the time.

    Newsweek: “The FBI said it had no comment to Newsweek questions about whether Mueller alerted senior Obama administration officials, including Clinton, about the [FBI] investigation before they brokered the [uranium] deal.”

    BOOM. Are you kidding? No comment? That’s tantamount to admitting, “Look, either way we answer that question, we’re screwed or the Obama White House is screwed, so we’re remaining mum. We’re protecting VERY IMPORTANT PEOPLE and the truth doesn’t matter.”

    And with that Rappoport shows Mueller was not a good choice for looking into US government agencies and powerful people who would sell out to Russians or Ukrainians. Were Paul Manafort and Rick Gates disregarding U.S. laws regarding Ukrainian transactions? Probably but they were not alone and one of those people is named Clinton and another undoubtedly Mueller.

    Smoke and mirrors and the average person does not have time to smash the mirrors and blow away the smoke. The only way out is to dissolve the control over information and Celia you and Jon are doing it even if you are not sure what the real story is. Hell no one know the real story yet…but we will with your help.

    Scott Gordon: Thank you for the link to Jon’s report
    https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/10/30/mueller-and-fake-news-charges-against-manafort/

  3. Oh wow.

    I did read it. And regardless of political affiliations and ramifications, it appears to implicate these two in treason against the United States of America ( by failing to register their employment with a foreign government) and numerous financial crimes including money-laundering and whatever else can be proven in court.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.